Erikha Feriyanto 262
Furthermore, another step that plays an important role so that it affects forecasting
results in addition to determining interval partitions is the process of forming fuzzy logical
relationship groups (FLRG). In fuzzy time series forecasting (Chen, 1996), if the FLRG of
Ai is (Ai→A1,A2,...,Am) then Ft+1=A1,A2,...,Am and the crisp value is the average of
the fuzzy set corresponding to the middle value of the interval (Chen, 1996). However,
Singh 's fuzzy time series forecasting method based on interval ratios is different from
(Chen, 1996) because the forecasting concept is based on the upper and lower and midpoint
bounds. Therefore, if there is a FLRG of Ai is (Ai→A1,A2,...,Am) then
Ft+1=A1,A2,...,Am and determines the average of the fuzzy set corresponding to the upper
and lower bounds and then obtained the midpoint. Thus, the forecasting result Ft+1 is
obtained by forecasting according to Rule 2.1, Rule 2.2, or Rule 2.3. However, if there is
an empty FLRG of Ai (Ai), then the forecasting result is Ft+1=Ai.
The forecasting results in Singh's fuzzy time series forecasting method based on
interval ratios are obtained through a heuristic approach, in contrast to fuzzy time series
forecasting (Singh, 2007a) which uses computational algorithms that aim to minimize the
complexity of calculating min-max composition operations in the FLR equation and time
in the defuzzification process. In simple terms, heuristics are simple guidelines or rules that
are commonly used by humans in assessing something or used to make decisions. The
construction of three forecasting rules, namely Rule 2.1, Rule 2.2, and Rule 2.3 aims to
obtain better results and affect very small AFER values.
Rule 2.1 is used for 2nd order fuzzy time series forecasting , Rule 2.2 is used for 3rd
order fuzzy time series forecasting , and Rule 2.3 is used for 4th order fuzzy time series
forecasting . The three rules have almost the same steps, which differ only in the initial
step, namely the addition of a new difference parameter (Dt) (Yang & Shami, 2020). The
establishment of new difference parameters as fuzzy relations is applied to the current state
to estimate the value of the next state in order to better accommodate possible data
vagueness and make it a powerful method. The new difference parameter for Rule 2.1 is
Dt=|Xt-Xt-1|, Rule 2.2 i.e. Dt=|Xt-Xt-1|-|Xt-1-Xt-2|, and Rule 2.3 i.e. Dt=|Xt-Xt-1-|Xt-1-
Xt-2-|Xt-2-Xt-3|.
The formation of a new difference parameter (Dt) results in the need to add four
other parameters, namely Mt1=Nt1=Ot1=Xt+Dt, Mt2=Nt2=Ot2=Xt-Dt,
Mt3=Nt3=Ot3=Xt+Dt/2, and Mt4=Nt4=Ot4=Xt-Dt/2 where Mtp is for Rule 2.1, Ntp is for
Rule 2.2, and Otp is for Rule 2.3 with p∈1,2,3,4. The addition of more than one parameter
produces many forecasting results so that it is expected to be able to reflect data variations
through the average of the forecasting results obtained. In Singh's fuzzy time series
forecasting method based on interval ratios, forecasting based on upper and lower limits
is expected to have flexibility in approaching actual data (Pritpal Singh & Borah, 2013)v. .
Then if the forecasting result of the four parameters is not in the closed interval of the fuzzy
or unqualified set more than equal to the lower bound and less than equal to the upper limit,
then the forecasting result (Ft+1) is the midpoint value of the interval (Pritpal Singh, 2017).
Meanwhile, implementing into the University of Alabama enrollment data because
related fuzzy time series research has been done previously by (Song & Chissom, 1993b),
(Chen, 1996), (Huarng, 2001), (Huarng &; Yu, 2006), (Singh, 2007a), (Singh, 2007b),
(Jilani et al., 2007), and (Zou et al., 2019). And by doing forecasting on the same data, we
can find out how effective Singh's fuzzy time series forecasting method is based on interval
ratios than previous fuzzy time series forecasting methods by (Song &; Chissom, 1993b),
(Chen, 1996), (Huarng, 2001), (Huarng &; Yu, 2006), (Singh, 2007a), (Singh, 2007b),
(Jilani et al., 2007), and (Zou et al., 2019). The effectiveness of the forecasting method
obtained can be determined based on the value of the average forecasting error rate
(AFER). Research (Song & Chissom, 1993b) obtained AFER 3.22%, (Chen, 1996)