Sri Maria Puji Lestari, Vira Sandayanti, Enggari Setia Putri 
Self direct learning readiness in the implemention of the e-learning method during 
the covid-19 pandemic period for medical students 2018 Malahayati University  54 
 learning media. (Wijaya, Lukman, & Yadewani, 2020) 
  E-learning  is  all  forms  of  learning  activities  that  utilize  electronic  media  for 
learning  (Wahyuningsih  &  Makmur,  2017).  Broadly  speaking,  when  we  mention  E-
learning, there are three. The main components that make up E-learning are: E-Learning 
System,  E-Learning  Content  (ISI),  E-Learning  Infrastructure  (Equipment).  E-Learning 
System  is  a  software  system  that  virtualizes  the  conventional  teaching  and  learning 
process.  E-Learning  Content  is  the content and teaching  materials that  exist  in  the  E-
learning system (Learning Management System). E-Learning Infrastructure (Equipment), 
namely  E-learning  infrastructure  can  be  in  the  form  of  Personal  Computers  (PCs), 
computer networks and multimedia equipment (Darmawan, 2014). 
  The  use  of  E-learning  in  the  learning  process  is  different  from  conventional 
learning.  Therefore,  if  universities  want  to  implement  a  learning  system  using  the  E-
learning method, it is necessary to pay attention to the level of readiness both in terms of 
infrastructure  and  the  readiness  of  the  students  themselves  (Lestari,  2019).  A  survey 
conducted by the Distance Education Online Symposium Listserv (DEOS-L) states that 
the main components of student readiness to successfully use E-learning are divided into 
two,  namely  Self  Directed  Rearning  Readiness  (SDLR)  and  Technical  Readiness 
(Prihantoro, 2018). SDLR is the readiness of a person to be able to learn independently. 
SDLR  components  are  attitudes,  abilities  and  personal  characteristics  (Lutfianawati, 
Lestari,  &  Istiana,  2018).  SDLR  itself  can  be  influenced  by  several  factors,  namely 
factors that are in itself (internal) and factors that are outside itself  (external). Internal 
factors that can affect readiness for independent learning, namely gender, age, learning 
style, mood and health, intelligence, education, basic knowledge and level of knowledge, 
socialization or previous experience. Apart from that, external factors affect the readiness 
of  independent  learning,  namely  study  time,  place  of  study,  learning  motivation, 
parenting style, accessibility of learning resources, and the year students enter university 
(Sugianto & Lestari, 2016). 
  Research conducted in Malaysia revealed that the level of E-learning readiness 
was moderate, this shows the importance of making students aware of technology in E-
learning, and the availability of technology resources. The results of the analysis show 
that there are significant differences based on demographic variables such as age, gender, 
ethnicity,  field  of  study,  and  education  level  for  students'  readiness  for  E-learning 
(Adams, Sumintono, Mohamed, & Noor, 2018). Research by (Seta, Wati, & Matondang, 
2016) stated that the average value of E-learning Readiness readiness at UPN Veteran 
Jakarta was  3,297. Based  on the Knowledge Management Readiness Level, this  value 
indicates that UPN Veteran Jakarta is in the "not ready" category and still requires a little 
preparation for online learning in order to apply E-learning Readiness. 
  Based on the interview conducted on the survey which was held on  Saturday, 
October 17, 2020, 10 students and medical students of Malahayati University class 2018 
obtained data that the level of readiness for independent study using E-learning media 
was not good. Interviews were conducted using WhatsApp electronic media taken from 
10  students,  5  men  and  5  women.  The  results  of  the  interview  showed  that  40%  of 
students were ready and 60% of students were not ready to carry out independent learning 
using E-learning media. 
 
RESEARCH METHODS 
 
This type of research used in this research is quantitative with a descriptive design. 
The  research  instrument  used  in  this  study  was  a  questionnaire  that  was  used  by  the 
research of (Sadiqin, Lestari, & Setiawati, 2016) which was modified by the researcher to