Peran Krusial Perilaku Impulsif Dalam Memediasi Pengaruh Kualitas Informasi Dan Interaksi Terhadap Minat Wirausaha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i6.32355Keywords:
impulsive behavior, information quality, interaction,, entrepreneurial intention, mediationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the mediating role of impulsive behavior in the relationship between information quality and interaction on entrepreneurial intention. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected through a survey targeting individuals who actively access entrepreneurial content via digital platforms. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and indirect relationships among variables. The findings reveal that information quality and interaction intensity significantly influence impulsive behavior, which in turn affects entrepreneurial intention. Impulsive behavior serves as a critical mediator that enhances the impact of information quality and interaction on entrepreneurial motivation. These results suggest that entrepreneurial communication strategies should consider the emotional and spontaneous tendencies of the audience to effectively transform interest into concrete entrepreneurial actions.
References
Akobo, L. A. (2018). Action learning through radio: exploring conceptual views and lived experiences of women entrepreneurs. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 15(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2018.1509838
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123.
Bhimani, H., Mention, A. L., & Barlatier, P. J. (2019). Social media and innovation: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(November 2017), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.007
Blanco-González-Tejero, C., Ulrich, K., & Ribeiro-Navarrete, S. (2024). Can Social Media Be a Key Driver to Becoming an Entrepreneur? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16780–16798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01764-9
Bort, J., Wiklund, J., Crawford, G. C., Lerner, D. A., & Hunt, R. A. (2024). The Strategic Advantage of Impulsivity in Entrepreneurial Action: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 48(2), 547–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231178882
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997a). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997b). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1
Byrne, O., & Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Different Strokes for Different Folks: Entrepreneurial Narratives of Emotion, Cognition, and Making Sense of Business Failure. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(2), 375–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12046
Chandrasekhar, K., Das, S., Gupta, N., & Jena, S. K. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Impulse Buying Behaviour Across Retail Channels: A Study of Physical Stores, E-commerce Websites and Mobile Shopping Apps. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 69(2), 1109–1120. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2024.33
Chen, Y., Fay, S., & Wang, Q. (2011). The Role of Marketing in Social Media: How Online Consumer Reviews Evolve. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.01.003
Colom, R., Escorial, S., Shih, P. C., & Privado, J. (2007). Fluid intelligence, memory span, and temperament difficulties predict academic performance of young adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(8), 1503–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.023
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2014.12.002
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success : A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914199107
Dess, G. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2005). The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718203300610
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-Discipline Outdoes IQ in Predicting Academic Performance of Adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944.
Fang, J., George, B., Shao, Y., & Wen, C. (2016). Affective and cognitive factors influencing repeat buying in e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 19, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.08.001
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2011). Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.002
Friederich, F., Meyer, J. H., Matute, J., & Palau‐Saumell, R. (2024). CRYPTO‐MANIA: How fear‐of‐missing‐out drives consumers’(risky) investment decisions. Psychology & Marketing, 41(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21906
Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Hilton, T., Davidson, A., Payne, A., & Brozovic, D. (2014). Value propositions: A service ecosystems perspective. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114534346
Hall, J. A. (2018). When is social media use social interaction? Defining mediated social interaction. New Media and Society, 20(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660782
Jiang, G., Liu, F., Liu, W., Liu, S., Chen, Y., & Xu, D. (2021). Effects of information quality on information adoption on social media review platforms : moderating role of perceived risk. Data Science and Management, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.004
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow (1st ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kamberidou, I. (2013). Women entrepreneurs: ‘we cannot have change unless we have men in the room.’ Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(6), 1–17.
Ko, S., & Butler, J. E. (2007). Creativity: A key link to entrepreneurial behavior. Business Horizons, 50(5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.03.002
Krueger, N. F. (2017). Entrepreneurial Intentions Are Dead : Long Live Entrepreneurial Intentions Critical Overview of Intentions and Entrepreneurial. In Revisting the Entrepreneuriial Mind Inside the Black Box: An Expanded Edition, International Studies in Entrepreneurship (hal. 13–34). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45544-0
Liñán, F., & Jaén, I. (2022). The Covid-19 pandemic and entrepreneurship: some reflections. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(5), 1165–1174. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2020-0491
Liu, W., Fan, X., Ji, R., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Perceived community support, users’ interactions, and value co-creation in online health community: The moderating effect of social exclusion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010204
Lo, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Tan, G. W., Ooi, K., Aw, E. C., & Metri, B. (2022). Why do consumers buy impulsively during live streaming ? A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. Journal of Business Research, 147, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.013
Mitchell, J. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.08.001
Moeller, F. G., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., Schmitz, J. M., & Swann, A. C. (2001). Reviews and Overviews Psychiatric Aspects of Impulsivity. American journal of psychiatry, 158(11), 1783–1793.
Moes, A., Fransen, M., Fennis, B., Verhagen, T., & van Vliet, H. (2022). In-store interactive advertising screens: the effect of interactivity on impulse buying explained by self-agency. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-0097
Park, J. Y., Sung, C. S., & Im, I. (2017). Does social media use influence entrepreneurial opportunity? A review of its moderating role. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091593
Pietersen, M. L., & Botha, M. (2021). Impulsivity and entrepreneurial behaviour: Exploring an unreasoned pathway. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 39(8), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211008149
Roberts, D. L., & Candi, M. (2014). Leveraging social network sites in new product development: Opportunity or hype? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(S1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12195
Rosita, J., Ihalauw, J. J. O. I., Abdi, A. S., & Sirine, H. (2023). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Social Media Adoption on Marketing Performance of Culinary Start-up Business. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(3), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0303
Sadler-Smith, E. (2016). The role of intuition in entrepreneurship and business venturing decisions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1029046
Sánchez, J. C., Carballo, T., & Gutiérrez, A. (2011). The entrepreneur from a cognitive approach. Psicothema, 23(3), 433-438., 23(3), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/2303192
Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media. Management Decision, 50(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203551
Seddon, P. B., & Kiew, M.-Y. (1996). A Partial Test and Development of The DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2769
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Shneor, R., & Flåten, B.-T. (2015). Opportunities for Entrepreneurial Development and Growth through Online Communities, Collaboration, and Value Creating and Co-Creating Activities. In Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21st Century (hal. 178–199). Palgrave Macmillan.
Shoimah, R. N., Lukito, A., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). The Creativity of Reflective and Impulsive Selected Students in Solving Geometric Problems The Creativity of Reflective and Impulsive Selected Students in Solving Geometric Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–6.
Tika, A. R. (2014). Perempuan Pebisnis Dalam Budaya Jawa Di Semarang. Universitas Diponegoro.
Troise, C., Dana, L. P., Tani, M., & Lee, K. Y. (2022). Social media and entrepreneurship: exploring the impact of social media use of start-ups on their entrepreneurial orientation and opportunities. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2021-0041
Wiklund, J., Yu, W., & Patzelt, H. (2017). Impulsivity and Entrepreneurial Action. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(3), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0177
Wu, S., & Fang, W. (2010). Technovation The effect of consumer-to-consumer interactions on idea generation in virtual brand community relationships. Technovation, 30(11–12), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.07.005
Xiao, S. H., & Nicholson, M. (2013). A Multidisciplinary Cognitive Behavioural Framework of Impulse Buying : A Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00345.x
Yeganegi, S., Laplume, A. O., & Dass, P. (2021). The role of information availability: A longitudinal analysis of technology entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120910
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dana Aditya, Ni Ketut Yulia Agustini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
