Perbedaan Perspektif Hakim dalam Putusan Sengketa Pembiayaan Murabahah: Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dan Keadilan Syariah

Authors

  • Salma Fauziyyah Hasna Magister Ilmu Syari’ah, Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i8.32427

Keywords:

Murabahah Contract, Judge's Perspective, Judicial Consideration, Sharia Justice

Abstract

The process of forming a judge's decision involves what is known as legal reasoning, which ultimately determines the direction of the judge's perspective in the verdict rendered. Differences in judges' perspectives in murabahah dispute rulings become important to examine further in order to understand why judges can reach different decisions in similar cases. Based on these differing rulings, the study also explores how the principle of justice is applied in judicial decisions. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case comparison approaches. The study concludes that the variation in judges' approaches in considering justice in disputes, both at the first instance and appellate levels, is the reason behind the differing judicial perspectives. This reality indicates that the application of sharia principles in legal practice can vary depending on the judge's focus—whether on substantive or procedural aspects of justice.

References

Abd al-Rahman al-Jaziri, al- Fiqh ‘ala al-Madhahib al-Arba’ah, Juz II (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al- ‘Ilmiyah, 2003), hlm. 250.

Adji, Oemar Seno. Peradilan Bebas Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1980. Ahroum,

Ali Jum'atu Muhammad. Mausu’atu Fatawa al-Mu’amalat al-Maliyah, Juz I. Beirut: Dar al-Salam, 2009.

Ali Jum’atu Muhammad, Mausu’atu Fatawa al-Mu’amalat al-Maliyah ,(Beirut: Dar al- Salam, 2009), hlm.18

Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu, Juz IV. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1983.

Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Mu’amalat al-Maliyah al-Mu’asirah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2002.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Rajawali pers, 2016), hlm.118

Asnawi. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama dalam Rekonsiliasi Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” IAIN Purwekerto, Oktober 2020.

Baude, W., dan Sachs. “The Law of Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review, Vol.

, No. 4 (2017).

Christianto, Hwian. “Penafsiran Hukum ‘Melanggar Kesusilaan’ dalam Undang- Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Kajian Putusan Nomor 265/Pid.Sus/2017/Pn.MTR juncto Putusan Nomor 574K/Pid.Sus/2018 junctis Putusan Nomor 83 PK/PID.SUS/2019.” Jurnal Komisi Yudisial, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2021).

Ibn Abd al-Bar, al-Kafi fī Fiqh al-Madinah al-Maliki, Juz II (Arab Saudi: Maktabah al-Riyadh, 1980), hlm. 705.

Ibn Abd al-Bar. Al-Kafi fī Fiqh al-Madinah al-Maliki, Juz II. Arab Saudi: Maktabah al-Riyadh, 1980.

Muhammad Ikhlas Supardin, “Sengketa Pembiayaan Akad Murabahah”, Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022), hlm. 136.

Shidarta, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum: Akar Filosofis, (Yogyakarta: Genta, 2013), hlm. 27.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2019), hlm.133.

Pasal 10 ayat (1)

Pasal 20 ayat (6)

Wahbah al-Zuhaili, Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu Juz IV (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1983), hlm. 704.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-06

How to Cite

Fauziyyah Hasna, S. (2025). Perbedaan Perspektif Hakim dalam Putusan Sengketa Pembiayaan Murabahah: Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dan Keadilan Syariah. Jurnal Sosial Dan Sains, 5(8), 6744–6751. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i8.32427

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 8 (2025): Jurnal Sosial dan Sains

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Salma Fauziyyah Hasna

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.